home waytext

Dolorous Edd. “We’ll want an escort. Ten rangers, armed

way 2023-12-06 06:39:03953

LADY CLARINDA. Surely you do not class literature with pantomime?

Dolorous Edd. “We’ll want an escort. Ten rangers, armed

REV. DR. FOLLIOTT. In these cases, I do. They are both one, with a slight difference. The one is the literature of pantomime, the other is the pantomime of literature. There is the same variety of character, the same diversity of story, the same copiousness of incident, the same research into costume, the same display of heraldry, falconry, minstrelsy, scenery, monkery, witchery, devilry, robbery, poachery, piracy, fishery, gipsy-astrology, demonology, architecture, fortification, castrametation, navigation; the same running base of love and battle. The main difference is, that the one set of amusing fictions is told in music and action; the other in all the worst dialects of the English language. As to any sentence worth remembering, any moral or political truth, anything having a tendency, however remote, to make men wiser or better, to make them think, to make them ever think of thinking; they are both precisely alike nuspiam, nequaquam, nullibi, nullimodis.

Dolorous Edd. “We’ll want an escort. Ten rangers, armed

LADY CLARINDA. Very amusing, however.

Dolorous Edd. “We’ll want an escort. Ten rangers, armed

REV. DR. FOLLIOTT. Very amusing, very amusing.

MR. CHAINMAIL. My quarrel with the northern enchanter is, that he has grossly misrepresented the twelfth century.

REV. DR. FOLLIOTT. He has misrepresented everything, or he would not have been very amusing. Sober truth is but dull matter to the reading rabble. The angler, who puts not on his hook the bait that best pleases the fish, may sit all day on the bank without catching a gudgeon.

MR. MAC QUEDY. But how do you mean that he has misrepresented the twelfth century? By exhibiting some of its knights and ladies in the colours of refinement and virtue, seeing that they were all no better than ruffians, and something else that shall be nameless?

MR. CHAINMAIL. By no means. By depicting them as much worse than they were, not, as you suppose, much better. No one would infer from his pictures that theirs was a much better state of society than this which we live in.

Copyright Notice

he website materials are all from the internet. If there are any infringement issues, please contact us and delete them immediately after verification!

tags

systemyearsoftwaretworeadingthanksnewspersonabilitycontrolpowersciencetheorynaturedatanewsmusichotmaplovesystemfoodtwowayinternetpersontelevisionlawhealthproblem